As the owner of a small architecture firm, you’re no stranger to the balancing act between managing day-to-day operations and delivering outstanding designs. One of the critical decisions you’ll face is whether to hire an in-house vs. freelance architect for your projects. Both options have their benefits, and the choice isn’t always clear-cut. But here’s the good news: You don’t necessarily have to choose one over the other. In fact, combining both in-house and freelance architects can provide a steady path to growth for your firm. 

In this post, we’ll break down the pros and cons of each option and explore how a hybrid approach might just be the solution you’re looking for. 

Why This Decision Matters 

Choosing between an in-house vs. freelance architect isn’t just about filling a position—it’s a strategic decision that can significantly impact the success and growth of your architecture firm. As a small business owner, every hiring decision you make affects your firm’s ability to deliver projects on time, maintain profitability, and scale effectively. 

The architecture industry is highly competitive, and the way you structure your team can be the difference between thriving in the market or struggling to keep up. An in-house architect might offer the consistency and control needed for long-term projects, while a freelance architect can provide flexibility and specialized expertise when you need it most. However, without a clear understanding of the pros and cons of each option, you risk making a decision that could limit your firm’s potential. 

This topic is crucial because it directly influences your firm’s operational efficiency, financial health, and ability to take on new opportunities. By carefully weighing your options and considering a hybrid approach, you can position your firm to not only meet its current demands but also to grow and adapt in a rapidly changing industry. 

Key Factors to Consider 

When deciding between an in-house vs. freelance architect, it’s essential to evaluate your firm’s unique needs and goals. One practical metric to guide your decision is your project backlog—the amount of work your firm has committed to but has not yet completed. 

Project Backlog 

• High Project Backlog (greater than annual revenue): If your firm consistently has a high project backlog, hiring an in-house architect may be the right choice. A full-time architect can help you manage ongoing projects efficiently, ensuring quality and timely delivery. 

• Low or Variable Project Backlog (less than annual revenue): If your backlog fluctuates or tends to be lower, a freelance architect might be a better fit. Freelancers offer the flexibility to adjust your team size as needed, allowing you to manage workload peaks without the long-term costs of an in-house hire. 

Project Volume 

In addition to considering your project backlog, assess whether your firm consistently handles a large volume of projects. An in-house architect can provide the continuity needed for ongoing work, while freelancers offer flexibility for handling varying workloads. 

Budget 

Your budget is a critical factor in this decision. In-house architects come with higher fixed costs—salaries, benefits, and overhead—while freelancers are typically paid on a per-project or hourly basis. Evaluate what your firm can sustain financially and consider how each option impacts your bottom line. If you’re running an architecture or engineering firm, here’s a simple rule of thumb: for every full-time employee on your team, your firm should be generating at least $250,000 in annual revenue. So, what does that mean for you? If you’re aiming to be a million-dollar company, you’re looking at supporting about four employees—yes, that includes you too.

Project Complexity and Timeline 

For complex, long-term projects that require close collaboration and oversight, an in-house architect might be the best choice. They provide the consistency needed to see a project through from start to finish. However, for projects that require specialized expertise or have a defined scope, a freelance architect can bring the specific skills needed without the long-term commitment. 

Company Culture and Collaboration 

An in-house architect can become an integral part of your team, contributing to your firm’s culture and long-term success. They understand your firm’s values and can help foster a cohesive work environment. Freelancers, while offering fresh perspectives, may not be as deeply engaged in your firm’s culture. However, they can bring innovative ideas and flexibility that can complement your in-house team. 

The Role of an In-House Architect 

An in-house architect is a dedicated member of your team, fully integrated into your firm’s culture, standards, and daily operations. They’re involved in every step of the project process, from initial client meetings to final delivery, ensuring that your firm’s vision is consistently executed. 

Pros: 

• Consistency and Control: With an in-house architect, you gain a level of consistency and control that’s hard to achieve with freelancers. They’re familiar with your firm’s design philosophy, processes, and client expectations, which means less time spent on onboarding and more time delivering quality work. 

• Availability: In-house architects are always on hand for team meetings, quick consultations, and urgent project needs. This immediacy can be crucial when deadlines are tight, or when unexpected challenges arise. 

• Long-Term Investment: Hiring an in-house architect is an investment in your firm’s future. Over time, they become deeply embedded in your firm’s operations, contributing to your long-term success and growth. 

Cons: 

• Higher Fixed Costs: The cost of an in-house architect includes not just salary, but also benefits, training, and overhead. For small firms with tight budgets, this can be a significant financial commitment. 

• Training and Development: Keeping an in-house architect’s skills up-to-date requires ongoing investment in training and professional development, especially as new technologies and design trends emerge. 

• Utilization Concerns: If your project load fluctuates, there may be periods where your in-house architect isn’t fully utilized, leading to inefficiencies and higher per-project costs. 

The Role of a Freelance Architect 

Freelance architects, on the other hand, offer flexibility and specialized expertise on a project-by-project basis. They’re independent contractors who can be brought in when needed, allowing you to scale your workforce according to your project load. 

Pros: 

• Flexibility: Freelancers provide the ability to scale up or down based on your current needs. Whether you have a short-term project or need specialized skills for a particular design challenge, freelancers can fill the gap without the long-term commitment of a full-time hire. 

• Lower Overhead: Since you’re not responsible for providing benefits, office space, or ongoing training, freelancers can be a more cost-effective solution, particularly for firms with variable workloads. 

• Access to Specialized Skills: Freelancers often bring unique skills and experiences to the table, such as expertise in sustainability, interior design, or landscape architecture. This allows you to offer a broader range of services without the need for full-time specialists. 

Cons: 

• Less Control: Freelancers work independently, which means you might have less influence over their time, priorities, and the consistency of their work compared to an in-house architect. Clear communication and detailed contracts are essential to ensure alignment. 

• Availability: Freelancers may juggle multiple clients, leading to potential scheduling conflicts. During peak periods, their availability might be limited, which could impact your project timelines. 

• Onboarding and Communication: Each new freelancer requires onboarding to understand your firm’s processes, which can take time and effort. Additionally, maintaining clear and consistent communication can be challenging, especially if the freelancer is remote. 

The Best of Both Worlds: A Hybrid Approach 

While there are clear advantages and disadvantages to both in-house and freelance architects, many small architecture firms find that a combination of both provides the best path to growth. Here’s why: 

Flexibility and Stability 

By maintaining a core team of in-house architects, you ensure stability and consistency in your firm’s operations. This team can handle ongoing projects, maintain client relationships, and contribute to the firm’s strategic growth. Meanwhile, bringing in freelance architects on a project-by-project basis allows you to scale your team to meet demand, access specialized skills, and manage costs effectively. 

Risk Management 

A hybrid approach also helps mitigate the risks associated with relying too heavily on one option. If a key in-house architect leaves your firm, having a network of reliable freelancers can help you avoid disruptions. Conversely, if a freelancer isn’t available for a critical project, your in-house team can step in to ensure continuity. 

Strategic Growth 

As your firm grows, you can gradually increase your in-house team, adding architects as your project volume and budget allow. Freelancers can continue to supplement your team as needed, providing the flexibility to take on new opportunities without overextending your resources. 

Making the Decision 

Ultimately, the decision between hiring an in-house vs. freelance architect comes down to your firm’s specific needs, goals, and financial situation. Here are a few guiding questions to help you evaluate your options: 

• What is your current project backlog? If your backlog is consistently greater than your annual revenue, an in-house architect might help manage the workload more efficiently. Conversely, a lower or more variable backlog could mean that freelancers are a better fit. 

• How consistent is your project pipeline? A steady flow of projects might justify the investment in an in-house architect, while fluctuating workloads could be better managed with freelancers. 

• Does your budget allow for the long-term investment of an in-house architect? Consider the fixed costs of salaries, benefits, and overhead compared to the more flexible, project-based costs of hiring freelancers. 

• Do your projects require specialized expertise or ongoing collaboration? Freelancers often bring unique skills for specific tasks, while in-house architects can provide consistency and deeper collaboration. 

• Are you looking to build a core team or keep your business flexible? Decide whether you want to invest in a stable, long-term team or maintain the ability to scale your workforce based on project demands. 

Remember, you don’t have to choose just one option. A combination of in-house and freelance architects can provide the stability, flexibility, and expertise your firm needs to thrive. 

Conclusion 

Deciding whether to hire an in-house vs. freelance architect is a significant decision for any small architecture firm. Both options offer unique advantages, and the right choice depends on your firm’s specific circumstances. However, by adopting a hybrid approach and closely monitoring key metrics like project backlog, you ensure your firm is well-equipped to handle current projects while staying flexible enough to seize new opportunities. This way, you get the best of both worlds.

At Telebooks Network, we’re here to help you navigate these decisions and ensure your firm is set up for long-term success. If you have any questions or need personalized advice, don’t hesitate to reach out. 

Subscribe to Learn More

Improve efficiencies at your architecture, engineering, or design firm by subscribing to this blog. Specifically, the blog provides hints and tips for the administration of Cloud Accounting, Payroll Services, and Professional Services Automation. When you subscribe, you get notifications when new posts are published. To subscribe to this blog, enter your email in the block below, and click the Subscribe button.

Explore Other Blog Posts